There is a strange and contradictory strand in Cincinnati thought that says look the other way when it comes to affordable housing, but complain loudly when someone opens an “exclusive” night club.  I’m not sure what to make of this, and I think it worth further consideration.

Take a look at by Brian Griffin, for example.  Griffin, a wannabe YP-er who , complains that the Young Professional movement spends too much time at establishments like Bang Nightclub, which he says are “exclusive” because they have a dress code. 

At the same time, so many people turn a blind eye toward the doings of 3CDC—who have gentrified OTR so that YP-types who can afford expensive condos might buy housing in OTR.

The total of these arguments is rather fascinating:  we need to get more creative class young professionals in town, but let’s not talk about the displacement of the poor that happens to accomplish this goal.  Let’s not talk about the politicians, corporations, or inner-elite affiliated with these actions.

Instead, let’s complain about a bar with a dress code, saying it is “too exclusive.”

If I had my choice, I’d say more exclusive bars, less exclusive living options.

It’s funny, because Griffin celebrated the close of Cincinnati’s second oldest bar a few days ago.  and suggested its clientele ruined the atmosphere for the more exclusive establishments.

Thinkers like Griffin, then, have a very narrow view for how the social spectrum should shine.  No dives (read “no working class joints.") No exclusivity (read “no places too nice for Brian Griffin"), but when it comes to gentrification in OTR, so few even seem to notice.

• Share This Article!
Listen to this article

del.icio.us

Furl It

Anonymous comments are allowed, but you can log in above to stamp your name and to avoid typing the anti-spam code.